Monday, March 25, 2019
The Duel Essay -- essays research papers
In reviewing earth-closet Lukacs, The Duel, I noticed that the author has other intentions in mind in addition the facts. Lukacs gives a very precise account of the actualy events during those eighty days moreover in my opinion he wants the reader to grab the bigger concepts. mavin of these concepts is that Lukacs wants the reader to honestly consider just how close the Allies came to losing the state of war. some other of these notions is the idea that the main distinction between Churchill and Hitler concerned nationalism versus patriotism and a third idea is just how greatly history so-and-so be effected by the courageous decisions of a a couple of(prenominal) people.Lukacs makes sound mention of how close Hitler came to victory. Hitler got everything he wanted for so long, without even having to renovate to force. Lukacs describes Hitler as being an amateur at generalship, but he posessed the great nonrecreational talent applicable to all adult male affairs an under standing of hu manhood nature and the understanding of the weaknesses of his opponents. That was enough to carry him very far(3). Lukacs wants to make that a point in all of his readers minds that Hitler could manipulate people so he could choke what he wanted without resorting to violence. Of course, the threat of violence was always wassail but Hitler was smart enough that he could scare his enemies enough that they would not want to engage in combat. Once actually forced to fight, Hitler let off dominated and he could have very possibly won the war if not for that one fatal mistake he made by hesitating in his plans against the side. I think it is important that Lukacs makes sure to get this message across because some people choose to ignore this honor due to the devastating outcomes that would have resulted if Hitler succeeded. The major point presented by Lukacs concerning the difference between Hitler and Churchill has to do with nationalim versus patriotism. Lukacs descr ibes Hitler as a nationalist and Churchill as a patriot. He describes Hitler as a man of ideas and Churchill as a of man principles, because Churchills ideas changed throughout the war while Hitler tended to think that his ideas were principles. In a annotate there lies a a brilliant explanation of this idea. Dr. Johnson states Nationalism is the last base hit of a scoundrel. Patriotism is defensive, while nationalism is aggressive. Patriotism is not a substitute for a relig... ...till evident in this directive when it says if necessary. Hitler delivered his speech for a last attempt at peace on July 19, but it did not work. One of his main goals for the speech was to disconnect the people of England from Churchill but this failed because of the expression in which he spoke active Churchill. The next day, Hitler said that the English response meant that the German attack would commenec on Britain in a few days. Looking back at how these events unfolded, everyone should be glad that Hitler made such a mistake. I, for one couldnt believe that Hitler made this mistake. Throughout reading this correct book Hitler usually makes swift, decisive actions that get results and that is why Lukacs stresses this string of events in the book.Overall, this book is wonderfully written on a very provoke topic. The reader is put in the middle of a war of poise and will between two men, one of which we have grown up to learn to hate. This only makes us even more emotional about the topic at hand. For a history book, it was surprisingly understandable and surd to put down. It enlightened me to the complex problems that existed in the most memorable collar months this century.